Should Jackson be replaced on the twenty dollar bill?

The privilege to be put on US money is held for a very few select people. Normally deceased American heroes and founding fathers of our nation. Andrew Jackson, the seventh president, is on our twenty dollar bill, and is regarded as a hero. But should he really be on there? Old Hickory was born on March 15, 1767 and died in June 8, 1845, he was elected into office by popular vote of the people and is regarded as a hero for the common man. But Jackson wasn't really as democratic as some people might think, and could even be regarded as King Andrew I. Andrew Jackson, a national hero, was born in a backwoods settlement in the Carolina's. Jackson would sometimes get into brawls and once killed a man in a duel, even so, Jackson was a well-liked man that people rallied around. Andrew Jackson was also to be considered as a war hero, fighting in the war of 1812. As well as defending at the battle of New Orleans. Common white men were big supporter of him, as he extended suffrage for them. Though president Jackson was also a big slave owner, which makes you wonder just how democratic was he? The only people who got a say were white men. Leaving over half the population as underclass citizens. Patronage, or the spoils system, is the practice of giving jobs to political supporters as a reward. This system, which is illegal and thought to be highly undemocratic today. Though president Jackson denied to take part in it, there is substantial evidence and proof that he did. Jackson appointed Swartwout, a criminal, as a tax collector in a government job. Swartwout was an early supporter of Jackson's cause and people hated him, yet Jackson gave him the job. Which ended up having 1.2 million dollars stolen. The main reason that Andrew Jackson doesn't deserve to be on the twenty dollar bill would be his unjust, illegal, and cruel displacement of the Native Americans. President Andrew Jackson disregarded the supreme courts ruling and had thousands of Native Americans march onto reservations so that they could use the rich land for settlement and gold mining. Thousands of Native Americans died while on the trail of tears and they despised him. So President Jackson doesn't deserve to his spot on the 20 dollar bill. He was undemocratic, only supporting white men, unfairly gave hundreds of job positions to his supporters in patronage, as well as owning slaves, and inhumanely relocating thousands of Native Americans. Many other U.S figures could deserve this place a lot more than Jackson. Andrew Jackson didn't even abide by some the laws, as he completely ignored commands and court rulings.

Revolutions of 1830 & 1848

The revolutions of 1830 & 1848 weren't really failures as historians have concluded them to be, and should receive some credit for progress in the long struggle toward greater democracy. Three key revolutions that should be mentioned in showing progress were…


1. The Belgium Revolution of 1830 : Belgians wanted to gain independence from Holland, teachers and workers barricaded the capitol of Holland in protest for their independence. This revolution was very successful as they gained exactly what they wanted, their independence. So this revolution was in no was a failure.


2. The Polish Revolution of 1838: Poland was divided up by Russia, Prussia, and Austria, and after the Congress of Vienna Poland revolted to gain independence mainly from Russia. Poland did gain their independence for a couple of months before Russia regained control. This revolution wasn't a total failure, their independence did last a couple months, and it inspired other nations to gain independence as well.


3. Hungary Revolution of 1848:  Hungary wanted independence from Austria. After Hungary revolted Austria agreed to reforms, but it was short lived as Austrians then crushed the rebels and regained control. Even though Hungary didn't gain independence, the revolution wasn't a total failure, their was a short period of time with reforms, and it inspired other nations to rebel as well.

Socratic Seminar: Child Labor Reflection

In today's class we had a socratic seminar on the topic of child labor, the key question we discussed was, would you or would you not buy products made by child labor? Some points that I brought to the discussion was the demographic, that 90% of children involved in domestic labor are girls. This shows that less prominent child labor is prejudice towards females roles in developing countries. Another point I brought to the discussion was that some children were actually willing to participate in child labor. Some children whose families live in poverty, are willing to work in less that okay conditions to help support their families. One more point that I brought to the discussion was when I mentioned that employers don't provide the children with proper safety equipment because they only care about making money, and buying equipment would also cost money.

During the discussion, other classmates brought up a lot of influential and important points as well. One point that was mentioned was the fact that a person could make around twenty dollars verses a child laborer who makes less that two dollars doing the same job. Another point that a student brought up  in the discussion was that children are still being bought like slaves today. One more point a student brought up was that even if you didn't want to buy products made by child labor, it's almost too hard to avoid it, you can't just check every little thing you're about to buy to see if it was made by child labor.

My overall assessment on what our group did well on would be asking interesting and thoughtful questions. Another thing our group did well on was allowing everyone the chance to share their thoughts. Two things we can improve upon next time, would be time management, and speaking up. I felt like we were a little rushed near the end, if we moved along the questions more efficiently we could've gotten more in. During the discussion, I sometimes had a little trouble hearing the other side of the room talking and discussing.

Scavenger Hunt Reflection

In Computer Apps. class today, we did an online scavenger hunt. One of my strengths when conducting searches is what to enter into the search bar to come up with the best responses. Two areas that I could improve in would be, time management and reputable websites. I normally take too long to search for one thing, and then waste time on clicking on sites that don't have the right answer.

The Numbers Have It: Statistics of Early Industrial Revolution

In History Class, we were given some statistics relating to the Industrial Revolution. Then we had to convert that information into a graph and explain how exactly it related to the Industrial Revolution.

The population of British people living in London between 1800-1851 increased by thirty-percent. In year 1800 twenty-percent of British people lived in London, and in year 1851 fifty-percent of British people lived in London. This change could indicate the rise of industrial revolution. More people would live in cities where there are more factories, which create more jobs.

City Inspection Report on the Horribly Glorious Industrial Revolution

In History Class we were given documents to analyze as city inspectors during the Industrial Revolution to better understand what living conditions were like back then.

"Levels of greenhouse gases higher than ever, says UN." BBC News. BBC, 22 Nov. 2011. Web. 17 Sept. 2014. <http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/15839594>.

This report dated 1844 has been provided for the urban planning committees of various cities in England. My name is Elizabeth Dee, and as a mid-level city inspector I trust that you will use the information within to determine appropriate needs in urban planning for your municipalities. My report has been through as I have made us of all the sources available to me and have worked to guide you through my own analysis and critical thinking to a full description of the issues facing our cities.

With the sources I’ve been given to inspect the life and work in the Industrial City, I have come across some positive points. In “The Cotton Mill”, John Jones, 1821 [poem] (Doc. B), the cotton mill is portrayed as a great place. It’s said to be a great trade, compared to “gorgeous palaces.” On the account of John Jones, the mill makes people happy, owners are friends of humankind, with their doors open to give employment. Another source, W.C. Taylor, “Notes of a Tour in the Manufacturing Districts of Lancashire” 1842. [book excerpt] (Doc. E), also shows that life and work in the Industrial City was great. It notes that the smoke rising from the lofty chimneys is spread out, and isn’t a nuisance, while creating a picturesque view. The machinery isn’t dangerous, workplace is well ventilated and a comfortable temperature. The source states that accidents are very rare and conditions are good with proper rest. Factories also create jobs and put food on the tables as well.

In contrast to all the good accounts on life and work in the industrial city there was also a lot of negative views on it as well. In Charles Dickens, Hard Times, describing a typical British factory town and the people who live in it [book excerpt] (Doc. A), Dickens tells of lots of machines, tall chimneys, smoke, black canals, and rivers that ran purple with dye. The workers also did the same boring job everyday with no change. Another negative account on life and work in the Industrial City would be Excerpt from “The Factory Town”, Ernest Jones, 1847 [poem] (Doc. C), as it tells of lurid fires, pent up hells that make volcanoes even stop, choking air, and torturous work. The last source I inspected was Excerpt from THE LIFE AND ADVENTURES OF MICHAEL ARMSTRONG, THE FACTORY BOY, Francis Trollope, 1840 [book excerpt] (Doc. D), talks about the ceaseless whirling of a million hissing wheels, scents that reek, oil, tainted water, human filth, and difficulty breathing. Causing helpless children with lean distorted limbs, sallow and sunken cheeks, dim hollow eyes, and premature age.

After analysing the sources given to me I think industrialization had more of a negative impact on living and working conditions in cities. Even though there was some positive things resulting from industrialization like, more employment, technological advancement, cheaper and faster ways of doing things, there was so much more negative impacts on cities. In document D., the conditions described seemed a lot more realistic for a factory with tons of machines. Working too many hours would definitely have an impact on children's health. In document A, the pollution described would definitely cause a negative impact on the cities, the living conditions aren’t fit for anyone to have to suffer through. After seeing all of the problems with life and work in the Industrial City, I advise there be some changes and laws made to protect people.